I’ve ranted against the whole culture of show don’t tell, and I’m going to do it again, but particularly against a strange fascination that writers feel with description. Yes, there can be too little description; but too much is also not a great idea.
So. Here we go.
Every time I get another aspiring writer to read and comment on my book (kinda a cross between a beta read and an edit) there is always some sort of comment about description, describing things and show don’t tell. But sometimes, you can have too much description.
For example, I recently had someone edit the second book of my series, and one of the comments was that I didn’t describe a particular building that was part of the first book and the second one. I took issue with that, mostly because they edited the book as though it was a standalone, which it is not. I’d already described the building in the first book, when the characters first encountered it. Because it is a series, I don’t feel that the second description is necessary, unless something significantly changed. Try not to describe the same things over and over, because you will bore your readers, and that is never a good thing.
Another good thing to remember is that not only is the description significant, but so is when you choose to describe something.
People are fascinated with knowing what colour eyes their characters have, and often want the reader to know as well. However, in real life, how often do you notice a person's eye colour when you walk past them on the street. Very rarely. I’m with some of my coworkers for eight hours a day and I still can’t tell you what colour eyes they have. It’s really just not something people tend to notice.
Characters. Every writer wants their readers to picture what their people look like, so description is rather important there. However, you don’t need all that much. If I told you someone was slimy, you probably have at least some idea of what this guy looks like.
If I tell you that an old witch had scraggly gray hair, wrinkled skin and knuckles bent and twisted with age, you probably have some sort of idea what this woman looks like. I don’t have to say that her eyes were a clouded blue, sunken beneath eyebrows that were whisky as clouds on a summer morning. I don’t have to say that she has a wart, with two little hairs sticking out of it, close enough to her snaggle-toothed mouth that food would sometimes catch in the hairs, like the beard of a young boy who has no business growing a beard.
Details are good, don’t get me wrong. But too much detail, all at the same time, is too much. You can sneak it in. Have a child stare at the witch in fear and then ask his mother why the woman had no eyes. Besides, how often do you stare at the mirror in the morning and evaluate each part of your face like you were monologuing for someone?
So. Be sneaky. Pepper in details about physical appearance through dialogue and surrounding events. Just don’t do it all at the same time. Remember that the reader is quite good at filling in holes in description. Often what they create will be clearer than anything that you come up with. They are an asset for you, and you need to use them. Let the reader do some of the work.
Writing is telling stories that other people will read. Not everyone gets the same mental picture from a description. It’s ok if the reader doesn’t see exactly what you do, and they like to create their own images for the stories.
What’s the first thing you think when you see a movie based on a book (after you read the book first)? Personally, I think that the character doesn’t look anything like the representation of them on screen, because I had my own picture. And that, quite frankly, is ok.